Senin, 31 Maret 2008

Antivirus Test 2008


That is actual a beautiful surprise. In my post-office box, the allerneusten Virenscanner-Testergebnisse arrived yet actually just now. The results do not come naturally wants to withhold directly of Andreas Marx and its test laboratory AV-test that I you.

Tested became Security suite (state 7 January 2008) under Windows Xp SP2 (English). In all products, it concerns the optimum version. (not however the betas)

The test categories of loud how follows:
- Signature-been based test of 1 million Malware-Samples out of the last 6 months (therefore no obsolete viruses)
- False-positive-test with 65,000 clean files
- Proaktive recognition with:
+ 3,500 samples in the retrospective test (that is the signature became a week does not update and it was viewed which new Samples now yet recognized/blocked become)
+ 20 active Samples for the behavior-were based test


- Reaction times (being based on 55 Samples per year 2007)
- Rootkit-recognition (12 active Samples)
First once the total evaluation signature-was based recognition:
Name recognized Samples Percent value
WebWasher 1023742 99.9%
AVK 2008 1022418 99.8%
AntiVir 1020627 99.6%
Avast! 1018204 99.4%
Trend Micro 1009662 98.6%
Symantec 1006849 98.3%
AVG 1005006 98.1%
BitDefender 1003902 98.0%
Kaspersky 1003470 98.0%
Ikarus 1002894 97.9%
Sophos 1001655 97.8%
F scnd original 999806 97.6%
Microsoft 992880 96.9%
F-Prot 986961 96.3%
Panda 979409 95.6%
Rising 962674 94.0%
Norman 962191 93.9%
McAfee 959919 93.7%
Fortinet 957558 93.5%
NOD32 953936 93.1%
De Web 887736 86.7%
VBA32 885313 86.4%
QuickHeal 862919 84.2%
ClamAV 791505 77.3%
Command 729233 71.2%
VirusBuster 693944 67.7%
K7 Computing 571329 55.8%
eTrust-VET 566161 55.3%

And now the entire in the detail.

First the classic signature-was based recognition:

Name Evaluation
AntiVir ++
Avast! ++
AVG ++
AVK 2008 ++
BitDefender ++
Kaspersky ++
Symantec ++
Trend Micro ++
WebWasher ++
Fortinet +
F-Prot +
F scnd original +
Ikarus +
McAfee +
Microsoft +
NOD32 +
Norman +
Panda +
Rising +
Sophos +
De Web o
VBA32 o
ClamAV
Command
eTrust-VET
K7 Computing
QuickHeal
VirusBuster

Legend (signature-recognition)
++ = very well (98% +)
+ = well (95% +)
o = satisfying (90% +)
- = badly (85% +)
– = very badly (<85%)

Next that False-positive:

Name Evaluation
eTrust-VET ++
McAfee ++
Microsoft ++
Symantec ++
AntiVir +
AVG +
Command +
F-Prot +
F scnd original +
NOD32 +
Norman +
Sophos +
Trend Micro +
VirusBuster +
Avast! o
AVK 2008 o
BitDefender o
De Web o
K7 Computing o
Kaspersky o
Panda o
QuickHeal o
Rising o
VBA32 o
WebWasher o
ClamAV -
Ikarus -
Fortinet

Legend (False-positive)
++ = very well (0 False-positive)
+ = well (1 False-positive)
o = satisfying (2 False-positive)
- = badly (3 False-positive)
– = very badly (more than 3)



From : http://blog.chip.de/0-security-blog/security-suiten-2008-im-test-q12008-20080122/

Related Post :



0 comments:

R